Danke, noisefloor - ich würde es auch so sehen, wie Du geschrieben hast.
Ich denke mal, daß ich, da die amerikanische Ardour-Mailingliste öffentlich ist, die dortige Argumentation hier zitieren kann:
"please, the Wiki shouldn't spread misleading information. Sure, Ubuntu provides Ardour, as well as antivir software for free as in beer, but unless you don't run a Linux server aimed for usage with Windows clients, antivir software scanning against Windows malware makes no sense. Apart from this it has got nothing to do with Ardour, let alone that a Wiki only should link against third party websites, if it's really required + if the one who adds the link, ensures that it won't become a dead link in the future. Maintaining the Wiki doesn't mean to add links to existing contributions, it means to consider if the link really makes sense and to maintain the Wiki, by checking from time to time if the link is dead. The "free as in beer" approach is also not really what Ubuntu or Linux is about, especially when mentioning Ardour you should consider that the concept of "free" is not meant as "free as in beer"."